Globalization and terror : Inspector Clouseau meets Ocean's 11
by toni solo
The Pink Panther's Inspector
Clouseau has a new rival. Interpol Secretary General Ronald Noble's
recent performance for Colombian President Alvaro Uribe's
narco-terror regime was an autopilot sub-routine derived from Colin
Powell's 2003
UN farrago
justifying the attack on Iraq. Noble has form for this genre.
Back in
1998 he justified giving evasive testimony (1) to the grand jury
investigating allegations against Bill Clinton. At the time, Noble was
one of Clinton's security team. British civil servants call it being
"economical with the truth".
Colombia had asked Interpol to
check out some computer gadgetry allegedly recovered from Colombia's
illegal attack on Ecuadoran territory on March 1st this year. Over
twenty people were murdered in the attack including members of
the
Colombian Revolutionary Armed Forces (FARC), four Mexican students and
an Ecuadoran. The Uribe gangster regime and its US and European allies
mounted a vicious
propaganda campaign alleging the computer hardware contained proof of
financial and material support for the FARC from Venezuela and Ecuador.
Both
the Ecuadoran and Venezuelan governments contemptuously dismiss the
allegations. Ecuador's President Rafael Correa recently said his
government has reason to believe some of the hardware may
already
have been in the Colombian army's possession long before the March 1st
attack.(2) Some incoherence between the cut-and-dried presentation of
Noble's media conference and the somewhat more circumspect content of
Interpol's report (3) confirm the legitimacy of scepticism about an
affair that makes President Uribe's crisis-ridden regime look even more
shifty and unconvincing than it did before.
Noble's media
conference was reported by some European media as containing
solid grounds for accusing the Venezuelan
government, especially, of
materially aiding the FARC. The UK Guardian's report (4) seems to have
been typical. Rory Carroll and Sibylla Brodzinsky reported Noble's
presentation of the report without noting that Noble's
presentation was in part made less categorical by the report
itself, which explicitly defines its limited technical remit.
The Guardian report does exactly what a group of academics and writers
specializing on Latin America feared such skewed journalism
might when they wrote an open letter to the media on the affair. (5)
They noted, "The Colombian interpretation has already proven so weak
that OAS Secretary General Jose Miguel Insulza, testifying before the
House Subcommittee on Western Hemispheric Affairs on April 10, stated
unequivocally that there is "no evidence" linking Venezuela to the
Colombian rebels, yet Insulza's statement has gone virtually unreported
in the English language press."
The open letter perhaps puts misplaced faith in the Western Bloc
propaganda media's ability to challenge their own side. The Western
Bloc ancien regime's current relative decline leaves little margin now
for ill-timed media stabs at objectivity, but plenty of room for
lop-sided "balance". For example, the Interpol report consistently
refers to the
computer hardware as having been captured during the illegal raid into
Ecuador. Few if any media outlets have questioned that.
But the only basis for making that assumption is to trust the
Colombian government. This is a government whose narco-terror President
currently faces an institutional crisis with dozens of his
political associates,
deputies and senators, either indicted or in jail. Uribe is desperate
to internationalize his internal difficulties against an opposed and
armed rival political project, just as another US puppet, Fouad Siniora
is trying to do in Lebanon.
Carroll and
Brodzinsky report "Ronald Noble, the Interpol secretary general, said
internationally accepted methods for handling computers were not always
followed, but Bogot� had not modified, altered or created files."
However,
Noble can hardly make that claim when not only the provenance of the
hardware is completely in doubt but when, as numerous commentators have
noted, the detail of the Interpol report itself is much more
nuanced than Noble's presentation.
Conclusion 2 of the report
notes that the computer hardware was managed incorrectly for two days
between March 1st and March 3rd. Paragraphs 77 to 90 of the report
explain how Interpol found thousands of system and user files activated
or accessed between March 1st and March 3rd. Conclusion 3 of
the report states that the Interpol analysts did not find any sign that any
user files were modified during that period.
The report does not say the files were not altered, only that no sign of any
modification as a result of meddling was found. So one is
invited to take on trust that the Interpol analysts are smarter than
possible interlopers. One wonders who might pay for the best help.
Would that be Interpol? Or the CIA and the narco-dollar backed Uribe
regime?
Ronald Noble's upside-down-Clouseau style - "we don't suspect no
one.... and we don't suspect, everyone!" - mobilised underpaid,
overworked Interpol geeks to footle about poking at bits and bytes of meaningless computer
data. Alvaro "Ocean's 11" Uribe and his goons probably had a good laugh
behind Noble-Clouseau's back after having slipped him the long
pre-fabricated goods. The whole object of the exercise has been to
create a sound bite for King Juan Carlos W.Bush, or whichever
plutocrat-anointed dauphin may succeed him as US President, so as to
justify US government
support for an eventual proxy military attack by Colombia on Venezuela.
It
is no surprise that Western bloc propaganda media like the Guardian
preferred to make a biased report of Noble's humdrum media presentation
than give a fair account of the
startling extradition of 14 of Uribe's paramilitary allies to the
United States on narcotics charges.(5) The Uribe regime's move
conveniently eliminates the possibility of those paramilitaries giving
chapter and verse to the Colombian courts on Uribe's links to
paramilitary massacres and narcotics deals.
The laptop story
falls into the long standing, weary pattern of Western Bloc propaganda
media manipulation, ommission and outright deceit. Following the
Interpol presentation, the Organization of American States Secretary
General, Chilean Jose Miguel Insulza said, "I respect Interpol very
much but the report issued was a technical opinion and does not refer
to the production or to the content of the documents procured."(6)
Insulza was speaking in Lima, Peru where he was attending the European
Union-Latin America Summit.
The important story as regards
Colombia in Latin America is that by now not even the pusillanimous
Organization of American
States is any longer prepared to give President
Uribe credence.
Colombia is isolated, regarded by most of Latin
America as a
problem state whose civil war and narcotics industry have irredeemably
corrupted its political processes. Mexico is headed in the same
direction.
That story is not one you will read in the Western
Bloc propaganda media. They are irretrievably tied to their countries'
trade, aid and debt hypocrisy and to their leaders' sadistic,
militarist
imperialism. Rather than reporting Latin America faithfully, those
media are busy manufacturing material to
attack the redistributive, humanitarian, solidarity-based trade and
cooperation model being worked out by the ALBA countries - Bolivia,
Cuba, Nicaragua, Venezuela and others including very likely
soon, Ecuador.
The upshot of the
Interpol
affair is that ALBA's enemies have got one of the sound bites they need
for war. Tendentious,
weak and dishonest as it is, that makes no difference for the purposes
of deceiving people in the US or in Europe. It will
suffice in the near future should the US and its allies decide on
military aggression against Venezuela in tandem with a strike on Iran.
One can just hear Dick Cheney and the Washington corridors echoing
Rumsfeld, "Go massive...sweep
it all up......."
toni solo writes for tortillaconsal.com
Notes
1. "Informe
de Interpol sobre la computadora m�gica", Luis Britto,
Rebeli�n, 18-05-2008.
2. (VIDEO) Correa
asegura que computadores no estaban en campamento de las FARC
Aporrea, TeleSUR, 17/05/08
3. Interpol
Report on computer hardware allegedly seized in Ecuador
4. "Laptop
emails link Venezuela to Colombian guerrillas", Rory
Carroll & Sibylla Brodzinsky, guardian.co.uk, May 16
2008
5.
"An Open Letter to the Media: Interpol Analysis of FARC Laptop
Authenticity Will Not “Prove” Links Between Venezuela, Rebels",
many authors, ZNet, April 27th 2008.
6.
"Extradition of Paramilitary Chiefs - a Blow to Truth",
Constanza Vieira, IPS, May 13th 2008
7. "El
informe de Interpol, s�lo "una opini�n t�cnica": Insulza",
AFP, La Jornada, 16/05/2008