Globalization and terror : Clueless in Latin America
by toni solo
Corporate globalization and its equally misshapen twin, the fake "war on terror", look
like the Western Bloc's last crooked chance to sustain a few decades longer its member countries'
habitual global power and
privilege. John Pilger has noted that seven months after the attacks on
the World Trade Centre in New York, Condoleezza Rice spoke of
the "opportunity" that outrage presented. She and her Bush
regime cronies subsequently imposed their imperialist agenda abroad and
their fascist agenda at home.
Globally, corporate
consumer capitalism now cannot even deliver minimal subsistence food
security, let alone broader economic stability. The global crisis
presents another opportunity for suave barbarian advocates of mass
murder like Rice and similar-minded me-too's like Hilary Clinton to
help provoke and exploit conflict around the world in the service of
their corporate plutocracy's narcissistic greed. Accordingly, G7
leaders have recently gamed a streamlined variant of
their endless hypocritical
sadistic war on the
world's impoverished majority.
Still
a shaky prototype at
this stage, the
"Clueless!" war-on-the-poor game builds on former versions
like the "Offshore!" war-on-drugs game and "Un-Habeas!" the
war-on-terror game. Rigged at the extra-superfluous end of
the market, "Clueless!" - a completely predictable
role-playing charade - is doomed to fail. Only corporate international
bankers and chief executives and their majority shareholders will
buy
it. Only they can afford it.
Loneliness of the long distance hand job
Like a philanderer phoned up in flagrante by their spouse, "Clueless!"
players bluff economic repair-work overtime in response to accusations of crimes
against
humanity of which they are unarguably guilty. In earlier
versions, outcomes came too soon, amid froth and bubbles. New, improved
"Clueless!" incorporates an esoteric central bank inflate-deflate sub-routine, the Extremely Visible Hand-job.
Designed to
make "Clueless!" more stimulating but somehow less adventurous, the Extremely Visible Hand-job
introduces dismal financial
policy ejaculations and fantasy roleplays of excruciating tedium. Mervyn,
King of Pawn, was top role
favourite going through the motions for recent game trials in
London's louche, seen-it-all "City" district. For
the US market, "Clueless!" has been adapted to take into account
security considerations, financial constraints and perhaps, too, US
prudery.
Ben
Bernanke's
five-mile-high-club helicopter has been taken away. Its substitute is a
range of poorly
maintained, second-hand, possibly former Soviet bloc, inflatable
term auction muckspreaders. This should
significantly cut the cost of "injecting" (downmarket Rupert Murdoch News
International analysts might use the more lubricious
"pumping") dollars into the world economy.
Wall Street Treasury tractor-driver Hank Paulson
is gaming these
inflatable muckspreaders right now in unlevel
playing-field trials between
Washington and New York. Everything flows to Wall Street. Hank and Ben are hoping their dollar
manure will fertilize ground rendered sterile by decades of toxic
GM
(Greenspan Manipulated) credit. It reminds one of Eva Gabor in "Green
Acres" doing the washing-up by throwing the dirty plates out of the
window. Hank and Ben should weld a roll-bar onto their clunky
dollar-spewing gizmos for when they finally turn over on top of them.
"Clueless!" corporate media
Global
corporate media insist on
confusing "Clueless!" with reality. "Clueless!" derived scripts
comprise the bulk of corporate media uncoverage of international
affairs. Perhaps most apparent in the Middle East, it prevails also in
corporate and other anti-reporting of events in Latin America and the
Caribbean. There, context for
corporate disinformation on Venezuela or Cuba is created by
anti-reporting noncoverage of countries like Colombia, Mexico, Haiti and
Peru.
Western
Bloc corporate propaganda media anti-reporting noncoverage
constantly minimizes the murderous systematic global fraud practised by
G7 countries and their allies. They accept G7
countries' agricultural subsidies in tandem with hypocritical invocations of
never-existed-nor-ever-will "free trade" for everyone else. They never
effectively criticize the obscene futility of a US military
budget greater than that of the rest of the world combined. All the time,
they and their governments falsely claim to be concerned about world
hunger.
They play down the long history of outright US and
European government terror practised throughout Latin America, Africa,
Asia and the Middle East. Now that history has overtaken them with
a vengeance in their own countries, G7 governments are implementing
similar varieties of the repression they provoked in the countries they
terrorized. Western Bloc corporate media accept as natural unjustly
rigged international economic relations. They pass off as
innocuous debt, aid and trade arrangements that channel
massive net flows of capital to Western Bloc financial centres.
They
support Western Bloc foreign policy in countries like Colombia and
Afghanistan whose dominant political base depends on narcotics. Via their offshore banking associates, Western
Bloc financial leaders knowingly launder hundreds of billions
of illicit dollars from these and many other impoverished countries. Western Bloc propaganda media
parrot faithfully the hollow slogans of the fictitious "war on drugs" which is
operated deliberately and primarily to subvert security arrangements
and manipulate political outcomes in target countries.
They
repeatedly echo attacks on Iran's legitimate nuclear programme but
never criticise Israel's blatant flouting of international nuclear
proliferation controls. They faithfully repeat the lie that Western
Bloc countries are committed to democracy and human rights while G7
countries facilitate Israel's genocide against the Palestinians. These countries work closely in league with Egypt
and Saudi Arabia and prop up other tyrannies like Jordan, Uzbekistan, Uganda and
Equatorial Guinea.
They
mounted vociferous campaigns against
alleged electoral fraud in the Ukraine but played dumb about outright
fraud in Mexico. Above all one is faced with the genocidal mass murder
sanctioned by G7 countries in Palestine, Iraq and Afghanistan and the crushing
barbarism of their continuing occupation. The main reason to peruse
Western Bloc propaganda media like the BBC, the New York Times, the
Guardian, El Pais or Le Monde is certainly to inform oneself, but
mostly about the latest corporate elite propaganda line.
Colombia - US funded corruption factory
Recent
corporate media news on Latin America actually included minimalist
bursts of real coverage with a sprinkling of negative references to
US-Colombia relations, a worm-ridden corruption
factory readily comparable to the ones in Iraq and Afghanistan.
This coverage happened thanks to King Juan Carlos W. Bush's
stalled
Colombia free-trade-in-your-sovereignty deal, Queen-Isabella-wannabe
Clinton's Colombia connections and also thanks in part, perhaps,
to President
Sarkozy's recent failed efforts to help Ingrid Betancourt.
But
it is still almost impossible to learn from mainstream
media the likely current extent of Colombian narco-terror
President
Alvaro Uribe's undeniable identification with the paramilitaries, of his
narco-gangster power base and of his system of political subornment.
Uribe's gangsterism almost never figures in mainstream Western Bloc
media noncoverage of Colombia. Their focus tends to be on alleged
narcotics dealing and terror attacks by
the Colombian Armed Revolutionary Forces (FARC).
The
Colombian guerrilla forces act within the terrifying circumstances of
mass rural population displacement and systematic massacres created by
the Colombian
government and its Western Bloc backers for over twenty years. It is
the Colombian ruling oligarchy and the paramilitaries they created,
along with Western Bloc covert action and corporate criminal
networks that have dominated and developed the narcotics business
in
Colombia. Human rights violations by the Colombian government's
army and security services are many times
greater than those of the guerrillas. So
far this year over 20 Colombian trades unionists have been murdered
either by government armed forces or police or by their paramilitary
proxies.
This week, President Uribe's cousin, Senator Mario
Uribe, faced
arrest on charges relating to his paramilitary connections. He fled
Colombia to seek asylum in Costa Rica. Costa Rica turned him down.
Mario Uribe will join dozens of Uribe-associated politicians
either already
in jail awaiting trial or indicted on charges relating to illegal
paramilitary
activity. The extent to which Colombia's justice system is being
used to work out conflicts and turf wars within the country's oligarchy
is not clear.
The
Uribe narco-terror regime recently declared their willingness to help
secure release from captivity for Ingrid Betancourt. The announcement was completely
hypocritical. The murder of FARC negotiator Raul Reyes back in
March had three obvious objectives. It eliminated the then-imminent
likelihood of Ingrid Betancourt's release, destroyed the groundwork
towards peace negotiations laid by Hugo Chavez together with Colombian
politician Piedad Cordoba and tested reaction to the use of US-Israeli
preventive war doctrine in the Andes.
Unreporting Mexico, Peru, Haiti
That interpretation is commonplace across a wide band of political opinion in Latin America. But it is
one readers of Western Bloc corporate media are unlikely to
encounter. Likewise, corporate media noncoverage and anti-reporting on
Mexico make it impossible for its consumers to get a realistic
perspective on Mexico's place in the current Latin American context.
The UN Human Development Index places Mexico, after over a decade of
the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), just below Cuba,
the victim of nearly fifty years of US economic blockade and terror attacks.
Mexico's
agricutural economy has been destroyed by NAFTA, leaving completely
inadequate employment alternatives for the millions of people displaced
from their former rural livelihoods. Mexico's experience proves
decisively that the wealth-concentrating neoliberal economic model
represents a thorough betrayal of the needs of the impoverished
majority in favour of a corrupt, already wealthy elite. The story of
that
betrayal and the repression applied to enforce it is another issue
consumers of Western bloc corporate media consistently fail to
encounter.
By contrast, quotes from
President Bush or Condoleezza Rice or John Negroponte and misleading analysis to the effect
that Venezuela's redistributive economic model has failed are
prominently quoted and circulated. Most Western Bloc news consumers
very likely think Venezuela is a failed State tyranny, a kind of Andean
Zimbabwe only propped up by its oil. In fact, Venezuela's economy is
among the most successful in Latin America. While poverty
levels fall in Venezuela, they get worse in Mexico. (1)
Similarly,
Western Bloc media invent non-existent government human rights
violations in Venezuela like the RCTV affair or misreport events like
last year's minority student unrest but unreport murders of rural workers leaders by Venezuelan
landowners. Human rights violations in Mexico, like the ferocious
repression in Atenco and Oaxaca in 2005 and 2006 or this year's murder of
two local media-workers in Oaxaca are anti-reported, falling
victim to standard corporate media noncoverage. Consistent government
repression in Peru, for example of last year's protest strikes, and continuing repression by
police and UN mercenaries in Haiti are likewise generally left
unreported.
Latin America's deep historical cycle
This
year will most probably see the Latin American Right and their US
government sponsors recoup some of the ground they have lost so
spectacularly over
the last four or five years. The unconstitutional separatist
referendums in
Bolivia, municipal elections in Venezuela and in Nicaragua may all
result in gains for the right wing opposition in those countries.
Certainly, the Bush regime and its European allies will exploit the
current economic crisis for all it is worth in terms of weakening the
appeal of progressive governments in Latin America.
Latin
America's oil, gas, mineral, water, forestry and biodiversity resources
remain priceless targets for Western Bloc imperialist powers.
Both Western Bloc media anti-reporting of Latin America and
its social-democrat style fence-sitting sub-varieties - all that glib "pink tide"
nonsense - underestimate the depth of the changes in play. Latin America
is undergoing a profound historical correction of injustice and
oppression that has been checked and set back time and again ever
since the independence struggles of the 19th century.
That
correction coincides with a relative decline in the power of the
imperialist centres, Europe and the United States, in relation to
global actors. Russia and China are obvious rivals for resources
and markets along with India and
Brazil. But regional blocs too have finally worked out that unless
they work together, the imperialist powers will pick them off one by
one. Central American countries recently decided to negotiate a "free
trade" deal with the European Union as a bloc rather than individually.
They have wised up after getting worked over good by Robert
Zoellick and his US trade team heavies during the Central America Free
Trade Agreement negotiations.
Venezuela's
development relationship with Iran has meant a
reconfiguration of forces within a different kind of bloc, OPEC. There,
Iran partners Venezuela, accompanied now by Ecuador. These
South-South alliances are detested by the US and Europe as are Latin
America's sovereign
regional integration processes, especially the Cuban and Venezuelan led
Bolivarian Alternative
for the Americas - ALBA.
It may be worth noting that the Venezuela-Iran
coalition counteracts the US-promoted Colombia-Israel axis - another
reason for the US government to gnash their teeth and pull their hair
out. Venezuela and Iran have just agreed a packet of food and energy
agreements. No wonder John Negroponte and his sidekick Thomas
Shannon are going bald.
Dud delayed reaction
While
the US promotes crisis in
Bolivia, in Central America governments are working together on the
looming food security crisis. In May, a meeting is scheduled to
agree
strategy for preventing widespread hunger in the region provoked by price rises and scarcities with an initial
proposal for joint investment in food security of around US$100m.
Venezuela, which recently sent hundreds of tons of food to Haiti, has
been invited. The meeting will follow up the recent ALBA country summit
on food security in Caracas. Central America is acting to
mitigate its food security crisis. Mexico's impoverished majority has the cold
comfort of NAFTA.
Currently,
US Assistant Secretary of State for
Western Hemisphere Affairs Thomas Shannon is talking softly about a
desire for dialogue with Venezuela while a
powerful US carrier force engages in military manouevres
offVenezuela's Caribbean coast. Combined with Colombia's trial
provocation
run, attacking Ecuadoran territory in March, that soft talk from
the State Department probably means another
US supported military provocation by Colombia against
Venezuela will take place this year.
Such
moves, like the US government-instigated separatist power play in
Bolivia, go
against the current tide
of Latin American integration. For that reason, whatever short-term
confusion they may foment, they are unlikely to prevail. In
the case of Bolivia, Brazil and Argentina will not accept insecurity
in Bolivian gas supplies on which their own
industrial and domestic consumption depend. Brazil and Venezuela have
already agreed in principle to create a common regional defence
council. President da Silva of Brazil has made clear to the US
government that it is not invited.
The
Bolivian constitutional crisis
is about to blow up. A centre-left president will shortly take power in
Paraguay. Food and energy prices are putting unprecedented
pressure on regional economies. The mix is right for Western Bloc
propaganda media to continue anti-reporting Latin America in
support of US and European efforts to roll back regional moves towards
sovereign solidarity-based integration. That will certainly be overall
policy in the run up to Latin America's next electoral round in
2010-2011.
Obvious
questions suggest themselves about Western Bloc policy in Latin
America. Why do the US and its allies support Colombia's murderous
narco-terror regime while attacking Venezuela's redistributive
humanitarian welfare state? Why do they support corrupt oligarchic regimes
in Mexico and Peru while seeking to undermine positive social and
economic reform in Bolivia and Ecuador? The self-evident answer is that
the Western Bloc countries and their media too are controlled by
a similarly corrupt vicious elite, one totally absorbed in a game of
"Clueless!".
toni solo is based in Central America - www.tortillaconsal.com
Note
1.
"Poverty Rates in Venezuela: Getting the Numbers Right", Mark
Weisbrot, Luis Sandoval, and David Rosnick, Center for Economic and
Policy Research - http://www.rethinkvenezuela.com/downloads/ceprpov.htm
and
"La pobreza una bomba de tiempo" Diario Monitor, 12 de julio 2008
-
(http://www.diariomonitor.com.mx/hemeroteca/1153546150/tema-04-22072006.pdf)
cited in
"Evidence of more Poverty in Mexico" -
http://machete2006.wordpress.com/2006/07/23/evidence-of-more-poverty-in-mexico/